Mere Introduction To Freight Forwarder Does Not Prove Intent To Evade Customs Duty: CESTAT Chennai

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chennai, on 15 October held that merely introducing an importer to a freight forwarder does not establish involvement in customs duty evasion or justify a penalty under the Customs Act, 1962. Technical Member M. Ajit Kumar set aside the Rs. 1 lakh penalty imposed on Chirag Jayant Shah, an assistant manager at A.E. Logistics Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai, for allegedly facilitating the import of undervalued branded glass stones. The Bench...

CKD Electric Two-Wheelers Without Battery, Charger Not Eligible For Customs Duty Exemption: CESTAT Delhi

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has denied concessional customs duty to an importer of electric two-wheelers in completely knocked down (CKD) condition because the kits lacked components required under the applicable exemption notification.A Bench of Officiating President Dr. Rachna Gupta and Technical Member Hemambika R. Priya, however, upheld their classification as complete electric two-wheelers under Rule 2(a) of the General Rules for...

Freshly Manufactured Goods Cannot Replace Re-Imported Goods For Customs Duty Exemption: CESTAT Kolkata

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Kolkata has ruled that goods re-imported for repairs cannot be replaced with freshly manufactured goods to claim customs duty exemption, even if they match in description and quality. Dismissing Crescent Foundry Company Private Limited's appeal, the tribunal held that Notification No. 158/95-Cus. requires the same goods to be re-exported after repairs or reconditioning.“This condition makes it clear that the goods which are to be...

CESTAT Chennai Says Suzuki Hayabusa Imported Via Two Ports Form One Vehicle, Upholds ₹10.36 Lakh Duty

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) on 6 October held that importing a motorcycle in separate parts through different ports cannot defeat the customs duty and restrictions applicable to a complete vehicle when the evidence establishes that the consignments form a single motorcycle. A Bench comprising Judicial Member Ajayan T.V. and Technical Member M. Ajit Kumar partially allowed an appeal filed by R. Dewakar, proprietor of Sri Vinayaka...

Deletion Of Certain Parameters Does Not Make Refined Palmolein 'Crude Palm Oil' For Customs Duty: CESTAT Hyderabad

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Hyderabad has held that deletion of acid value and total carotenoid parameters from a customs exemption notification did not mean that refined or processed palmolein would qualify as “Crude Palm Oil” for concessional customs duty.The Bench of Judicial Member Angad Prasad and Technical Member P. Anjani Kumar observed that the exemption could not be denied merely because the goods failed to meet parameters that were no longer part of...

CESTAT Allahabad Sets Aside Value Enhancement, Finds Import Data Missing From Acceptance Letters

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Allahabad has recently refused to treat an importer's written acceptance of enhanced customs values as conclusive after finding that the letters did not contain the contemporaneous import data cited as the basis for the enhancement.“Given the language as noted in some of the letters as written by the appellant and placed above, there is a wide gap which has not been bridged by the Revenue, in the matter. The contents of this...

Disposable Cuvettes Can Be Classified As Parts Of Diagnostic Equipment: CESTAT Chennai

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that specially designed micro-cuvettes used with Roche Diagnostics India's Cobas c111 analyser are classifiable as parts of the diagnostic equipment. It ruled that the cuvettes' disposable nature did not by itself prevent such classification.A Bench of Judicial Member P. Dinesha and Technical Member M. Ajit Kumar held that the “Integra Microcuvetten, Micro Cuvette Segment” was not merely a plastic...

Thermic Fluid Used For Initial Filling Of Manufacturing Plant Qualifies As 'Capital Goods': CESTAT Mumbai

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Mumbai has held that thermic fluid used to initially charge and operate a Continuous Polycondensation (CP) plant qualifies as “capital goods” for customs duty exemption.“In view of the above discussion and analysis of the statutory provisions under FTP and the notification dated 14.09.2009 regarding the scope and coverage of 'capital goods', and the nature of thermic fluids viz., 'Dowtherm RP Heat Transfer Fluid' / 'Dowtherm A Heat...

NVOCC Cannot Charge Demurrage On Customs-Seized Goods Despite 60-Day SCMTR Rule: CESTAT Mumbai

On 24 September, the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Mumbai held that a Non-Vessel Operating Common Carrier (NVOCC) acting as a Customs Cargo Service Provider (CCSP) cannot charge rent or demurrage on goods seized or detained by Customs, even if the Sea Cargo Manifest and Transhipment Regulations, 2018 (SCMTR) permit recovery of detention charges after 60 days in specified circumstances. A Bench comprising Judicial Member Ajay Sharma and Technical Member M.M....

Customs Can Recover Differential Duty Without Challenging Importer's Self-Assessment: CESTAT Ahmedabad

The Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) on 23 September held that the Customs Department can demand differential duty under Section 28 of the Customs Act without first challenging an importer's self-assessment. A Bench comprising Judicial Member Dr. Ajaya Krishna Vishvesha and Technical Member Satendra Vikram Singh partly allowed an appeal filed by Famous Steel, observing that anti-dumping duty is a customs duty on which IGST is payable, while...

CESTAT Chennai Sets Aside ₹23.17 Crore Demand Against Toyota, Rejects Reclassification Of 226 Parts

On 23 September, the Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) set aside a Rs. 23.17 crore customs duty demand against Toyota Kirloskar Motor Pvt. Ltd. over the classification of 226 imported motor vehicle parts. It also held that the extended limitation period was unavailable and set aside the confiscation, Rs. 17 crore redemption fine and penalty imposed on the company.A Bench comprising Technical Member Vasa Seshagiri Rao and Judicial Member Ajayan T.V....

Genuine Exporters Should Not Face 'Needless Litigation' Over Inadvertent Procedural Lapses: Calcutta High Court

The Calcutta High Court has directed the Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) to take measures to ensure that genuine exporters are not driven to “needless litigation” over inadvertent procedural lapses that can be rectified in accordance with law.“The DGFT authorities must take appropriate measures, whether by issuing comprehensive instructions or by suitable technological adjustments, to ensure that genuine exporters are not driven to needless litigation on account of inadvertent...