CESTAT Chennai Orders Refund Of Excise Duty On Revised Price Not Accepted By Buyer

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chennai, has held that excise duty paid on a higher price claimed through supplementary invoices cannot be sustained where the buyer never accepted that price. “The contemporaneous letter dated 13.07.2015 issued by the buyer clearly establishes that the supplementary invoice was not accepted, the amount was not accounted in the books and no CENVAT credit was availed. Thus, the revised value never crystallized into a transaction...

CESTAT Sets Aside ₹3.63 Crore CENVAT Credit Demand Against India Cements Over Imported Coal

In a relief to cement major The India Cements Ltd., the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chennai has set aside a Rs.3.63 crore CENVAT credit demand along with interest and penalty, holding that credit cannot be denied merely because Countervailing Duty (CVD) was paid at concessional rates on imported steam coal.A Chennai bench of Judicial Member Ajayan T.V. and Technical Member Vasa Seshagiri Rao allowed the company's appeal against an Order-in-Original dated...

Excise Act | Statements Recorded During Probe Not Admissible Without Following Mandatory Procedure: CESTAT Delhi

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi, has held that statements recorded during investigation (Section 14) under the Central Excise Act cannot be relied upon unless the mandatory procedure governing their admissibility (Section 9D) is followed, and any penalty based solely on such statements is unsustainableSection 14 of the Central Excise Act, 1944, empowers authorized Central Excise Officers to summon any person to give evidence or produce...

CESTAT Chennai Allows ₹84 Lakh CENVAT Credit Claim By Komatsu India For Factory Expansion

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal has ruled that Komatsu India Pvt. Ltd. was entitled to claim tax credit worth Rs 84.08 lakh on services used to expand its factory. A coram of Judicial Member P. Dinesha and Technical Member Vasa Seshagiri Rao noted that the company, which manufactures dump trucks, had added a new facility next to its existing plant to produce hydraulic excavators. While expanding the plant, the company took credit for taxes paid on...

Only Input Credit Used For Both Taxable and Exempt Activities Must Be Reversed: CESTAT Chennai

The Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) at Chennai has held that while reversing CENVAT credit under Rule 6(3A) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, only common credit used for both taxable and exempted activities needs to be considered and not credit used exclusively for dutiable goods. The tribunal set aside the demands, interest, and penalties against Tamil Nadu Newsprint and Papers Ltd.Rule 6(3A) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, provides a formula-based, actionable...

Freight, Insurance Includable In Assessable Value For Excise Duty If Delivery at Buyer's Premises: CESTAT Ahmedabad

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Ahmedabad Bench, has held that freight and insurance charges are includable in the assessable value for excise duty where goods are delivered at the buyer's premises and not at the factory gate, thereby upholding the demand of duty, interest, and penalty. Referring to Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944, the tribunal observed, "Above provisions clearly indicate that when excisable goods are not sold at the factory gate but...

Tobacco Pouches Up To 10g Not Liable To MRP-Based Excise Duty: CESTAT Chandigarh

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chandigarh, has ruled that small tobacco pouches of 4 grams and 9 grams are not liable to MRP-based valuation under Section 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944, allowing a batch of appeals filed by Shiva Tobacco Co. and others. If Section 4A (MRP-based valuation) does not apply, valuation falls back to Section 4 (transaction value).The bench comprising Judicial Member S. S. Garg and Technical Member P. Anjani Kumar delivered the...

One Department Wing Cannot Contradict Another On Excise Duty Assessment: CESTAT Chennai

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) on 2 April held that Central Excise authorities cannot question or reclassify goods already assessed by Customs at the time of import. A Bench comprising Judicial Member P. Dinesha and Technical Member M. Ajit Kumar set aside the demand of CENVAT credit on imported software by Emerson Process Management Chennai Pvt. Ltd. The Tribunal observed: “When payment of CVD & SAD was accepted and the Customs...

Recovery Proceedings Can Be Initiated Only Against Persons Liable To Pay Excise Duty: CESTAT Mumbai

The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) on 12 April held that proceedings under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 cannot be initiated against persons who are not chargeable with duty. Section 11A provides the statutory mechanism for recovery of unpaid or short-paid excise duty within one year in normal cases and within five years in cases involving fraud.A Bench comprising Judicial Member S.K. Mohanty and Technical Member M.M. Parthiban set...

CESTAT Bangalore Sets Aside ₹1.52 Crore Excise Demand, Rejects Arbitrary Profit Loading In Job Work Valuation

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Bangalore, has recently set aside a demand exceeding Rs. 1.52 crore, holding that the valuation of goods manufactured through job work and sold to job workers cannot be determined on arbitrary assumptions. The tribunal ruled that where goods are cleared on a principal-to-principal basis and price is the sole consideration under Section 4(1)(a) of the Central Excise Act, the transaction value must be accepted.The ruling was...

Job Worker Entitled To CENVAT Credit On Capital Goods Despite Invoice Name Mismatch: CESTAT Chennai

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) on 30 March, held that a job worker can avail CENVAT credit on capital goods even if invoices are not issued in its name, provided the goods are received, accounted for, and used in the manufacturing process. A Bench comprising Judicial Member P. Dinesha and Technical Member Vasa Seshagiri Rao held: “In view of the above discussions, we are of the view that the allegation of the Revenue that ACPL had availed...

Invoice Errors Cannot Block CENVAT Credit If Receipt And Use of Goods Are Proven: CESTAT Bangalore

The Bangalore Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) on 24 March clarified that minor discrepancies in invoices cannot justify denial of CENVAT credit where the receipt and use of goods are duly established. A Bench comprising Judicial Member Dr. D.M. Misra and Technical Member Pullela Nageswara Rao held that the denial of credit to Kavveri Telecom Products Ltd., the appellant, was unjustified, as it had produced sufficient documentary evidence demonstrating...