VAT Payment Doesn't Exempt Fit-Out Charges From Service Tax, CENVAT Credit Allowed: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court on 12 October held that payment of Value Added Tax (VAT) on fit-out charges does not automatically exempt the same transaction from service tax. Further, a portion of the consideration for leased office premises must be attributed to fit-outs provided under the lease agreements. A Division Bench comprising Justices Anita Sumanth and C. Kumarappan upheld CENVAT credit claimed by Ascendas IT Park (Chennai) Ltd. on specified input services, while deciding an appeal filed by...

Service Tax | Delhi High Court Deprecates Practice Of Issuing Clarifications To Bypass Advance Ruling Mechanism

The Delhi High Court has deprecated the practice of service tax authorities issuing clarifications to bypass the statutory mechanism of advance rulings for determining tax liability.The Division Bench of Justices Avneesh Jhingan and Shail Jain made the observation while disposing of a writ petition filed by Bajaj Capital Ltd., which had challenged a 2007 communication issued by the Commissioner of Service Tax, Delhi, regarding the applicability of service tax to its activities.Bajaj Capital was...

Micromax's ₹154 Crore Deposit In Ericsson Patent Case Was Not Royalty For Service Tax: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has held that ₹154.79 crore deposited by Micromax Informatics Ltd. pursuant to interim orders passed in a patent dispute with Ericsson could not be treated as a payment towards royalty for the purpose of service tax.The Division Bench of Justices Avneesh Jhingan and Shail Jain was hearing an appeal filed by the CGST Department against a CESTAT order upholding the dropping of a service tax demand against Micromax.The dispute arose from litigation between Micromax and...

Patna High Court Orders ₹1.24 Lakh Refund After Service Tax Appeal Pre-Deposit Paid Twice, Grants 12% Interest

The Patna High Court has directed the Central GST and Central Excise Department to refund ₹1,24,175 to a petitioner after finding that the amount paid towards the mandatory pre-deposit for a service tax appeal was deposited twiceThe Division Bench of Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad and Justice Sunil Dutta Mishra also directed the Department to pay interest at 12% per annum from the date of the second receipt until payment, along with ₹25,000 towards litigation costs.The Court further permitted the...

Madras High Court Upholds Setting Aside Of ₹2.63 Crore Service Tax Demand On TNCSC Over Storage Godowns

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court has upheld an order setting aside a ₹2.63 crore service tax demand against the Tamil Nadu Civil Supplies Corporation (TNCSC). The demand was raised for the construction of scientific storage godowns used primarily to store paddy procured from farmers for distribution through the Public Distribution SystemA Division Bench of Justice M. Dhandapani and Justice N. Dileep Kumar held that TNCSC qualifies as a “governmental authority” under the Mega Exemption...

Charitable Donations Not Taxable As 'Sponsorship' Without Reciprocal Obligation: Madras High Court

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court on 16 September held that charitable contributions cannot be treated as taxable sponsorship services where the recipient is not under an obligation to provide anything in return. A Division Bench of Justices G.R. Swaminathan and M.D. Sumathi set aside the entire service tax demand raised against Karur Vysya Bank Ltd. They held that the Revenue failed to prove most contributions were sponsorship services, while noting that even the two qualifying...

DIN On Tax Appellate Order Does Not Prove It Was Delivered To Taxpayer: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court has held that the presence of a Document Identification Number (DIN) on an appellate order does not, by itself, establish that the order was served on the assessee. The court ruled that the DIN cannot be used to establish the date of service for calculating the limitation period for an appeal.A Division Bench of Justice Anita Sumanth and Justice S. Raveekumar was dealing with a batch of nine appeals filed by Greaves Cotton Ltd. challenging CESTAT orders dismissing its...

Taxpayer Can't Be Denied Sabka Vishwas Benefit Over Tax Quantification Sent To Bank: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court on 22 September held that a taxpayer cannot be denied the benefit of the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme merely because the department quantified its service tax liability in a communication addressed to the taxpayer's bank rather than directly to the taxpayer. A Division Bench of Justices M.S. Karnik and Sandesh D. Patil allowed RG Studios' petition challenging the rejection of its declaration under the Scheme, under which the firm had declared service...

Madras High Court Directs Refund Of ₹6.41 Lakh To The Madras Club, Says Tax Burden Not Passed On Members

The Madras High Court on 1 September directed the authorities to refund Rs.6.41 lakh to The Madras Club, after finding that the club had not passed on the tax burden to its members to that extent. A Division Bench of Justices Anita Sumanth and C. Kumarappan partly allowed the club's appeal against a CESTAT order rejecting its refund claim. The judges held: “...in respect of the portion of the amount in a sum of Rs.9,09,717/-, the appellant has already passed on the burden to its members....

Delhi High Court Waives ₹4.5 Lakh Penalty After Finding Service Tax Default Was Bona Fide, Not Deliberate

The Delhi High Court has set aside a ₹4.5 lakh penalty imposed on a consultancy firm for non-payment of service tax, holding that the default arose from a bona fide and reasonable belief regarding the taxability of its services and was not a deliberate attempt to evade tax.The Division Bench of Justices Anil Kshetarpal and Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora set aside the penalty imposed on Appellant under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, and observed,“the non-payment of service tax by the Appellant...

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Revenue's ₹3.44 Cr Service Tax Appeal Over Fees Collected From Gir Forest Visitors

The Gujarat High Court has dismissed a Revenue appeal against the Deputy Conservator of Forests in a ₹3.44-crore service tax dispute over permit fees, entry fees, camera fees, and other charges collected from visitors to Gir Forest.The court relied on an earlier ruling that had held that such fees cannot be treated as consideration for taxable services, as the Deputy Conservator of Forests was discharging sovereign functions while collecting them in his official capacity.A Division Bench...

Meghalaya High Court Sets Aside Service Tax Demand Over 8.5-Year Adjudication Delay

The Meghalaya High Court has recently set aside a service tax demand against the Assam Rifles Group Insurance Scheme (ARGIS). It held that the Revenue authorities could not justify taking nearly 8.5 years to adjudicate the show-cause notice.The Division Bench of Justice H.S. Thangkhiew and Justice B. Bhattacharjee observed that the delay was “undue and unexplained”. It held that the order passed after such a delay violated Section 73(4B)(b) of the Finance Act, 1994, and was “arbitrary and bad in...